Skip to content
AgriVaultData

Agricultural systems · Technology · Advisory · Implementation

Building the systems behind stronger agricultural institutions.

AgriVault Data works with governments, development partners and agricultural organisations to design and deploy the data systems, field operations, digital products and reporting infrastructure needed to manage agriculture at scale.

Who we work with

  • National governments
  • Ministries & agencies
  • Development partners
  • Agricultural programmes
  • Cooperatives
  • Supply-chain operators

The institutional problem

Agricultural programmes often run on disconnected records.

Field forms, spreadsheets, GIS files, warehouse ledgers and reports are held separately, so figures cannot be traced back to the field. AgriVault brings technology, programme design and implementation together to connect them.

Showing today: six sources held separately, with no links between them.

No single record

6 sources · 0 links

  • Paper

    01

    Field forms

    Re-keyed weeks later

  • Spreadsheet

    02

    Beneficiary lists

    Duplicates across lists

  • GIS file

    03

    Plot maps

    Not linked to farmers

  • Warehouse

    04

    Stock ledgers

    Reconciled by hand

  • PDF

    05

    Quarterly report

    Cannot be traced

  • Phone calls

    06

    Officer updates

    Not recorded

Today · sources held separately


What we do

Six practices. Each is defined by the institutional outcome it produces, and each can draw on the products we build.

  1. 01

    Agricultural Systems & Digital Infrastructure

    The shared data model, identity, access and integration layer an agricultural institution runs on.

    Institutional outcome

    One trusted record of farmers, farms, inputs and activity, owned by the institution.

  2. 02

    Field Operations & Digitization

    Moving registration, inspection and extension work from paper to supervised digital workflows.

    Institutional outcome

    Field work that arrives verified, attributed and on time — including from areas without coverage.

  3. 03

    GIS & Land Intelligence

    Plot boundaries, administrative geography and facility locations tied to operational records.

    Institutional outcome

    Every plot, facility and record placed on the map it belongs to — and traceable back to who captured it.

  4. 04

    Supply Chain & Traceability

    Warehouse registries, receipts, transfers and custody chains for inputs and produce.

    Institutional outcome

    A custody trail for inputs and produce that reconciles without re-keying.

  5. 05

    Reporting & Institutional Intelligence

    County, national, donor and executive reporting generated from the operational record.

    Institutional outcome

    Reports that can be traced back to the records they were built from.

  6. 06

    Programme Design & Implementation

    Scoping, workflow design, training, rollout and measurement for agricultural programmes.

    Institutional outcome

    A programme that is designed around the institution, delivered in phases and measured against agreed criteria.

How we work

An implementation partner, from diagnosis to handover.

Every engagement follows the same six stages. Software arrives in the middle of the process, and the last stage exists to leave the institution able to run the system itself.

  1. 01

    Before

    Diagnose

    Understand the programme as it runs today: structures, data, connectivity and constraints.

    Output

    Diagnostic report and recommended path

  2. 02

    Before

    Design

    Configure workflows, roles and reports around the institution's existing administrative levels.

    Output

    Programme and system design

  3. 03

    Live

    Deploy

    Train officers, equip teams and go live in phases, starting with a defined area.

    Output

    Live pilot in agreed geography

  4. 04

    Live

    Operate

    Run, support and maintain day-to-day operations alongside institutional teams.

    Output

    Operational support and service reporting

  5. 05

    Review

    Measure

    Assess results against the criteria agreed at the design stage.

    Output

    Evaluation against agreed criteria

  6. 06

    After

    Transfer capability

    Hand over skills, documentation and ownership so the institution can run the system.

    Output

    Capability and ownership plan

  7. The detail of each stage, and what the institution receives.

    Our methodology

Products we deploy

Products, deployed inside the work.

We build our own systems and configure them to each programme, geography and institutional structure.

Record lineage

Sample

  1. Captured in the fieldField officer · offlineSynced
  2. District verificationDistrict agriculture officerVerified
  3. County approvalCounty officeApproved
  4. National consolidationProgramme teamPending

Flagship product

AgriVault Operations Platform

One operational record from field capture through district verification, county approval and national reporting.

View product

Starting market · Liberia

Pilot · being validated

Liberia Agricultural Intelligence Programme

Where the work begins: one country, three pilot counties, and an implementation programme designed to expand in phases and travel to other markets.

Counterparties
County and district agriculture offices, with programme partners
Scope
Nimba, Bong and Lofa counties
Engagement
Pilot implementation programme
Phasing
Diagnose → pilot → phased expansion
Status
Pilot, 2026 · being validated
Read the programme
Map of Liberia's fifteen counties. Nimba, Bong and Lofa, the pilot counties, are highlighted.
Pilot counties · Nimba, Bong, Lofa

County boundaries: UNMIL / OCHA, via geoBoundaries (CC BY 3.0 IGO)

Institutional outcomes

What changes when the system works.

Results are measured against criteria agreed with each partner. We don’t publish figures before they are validated.

  1. 01

    Better programme visibility

    Leadership sees field activity as it is recorded, not weeks later in a compiled report.

  2. 02

    Traceable field records

    Each record carries who captured it, where, when and who approved it.

  3. 03

    Stronger reporting

    Reports are produced from the operational record instead of re-keyed spreadsheets.

  4. 04

    Better coordination

    Field, district, county and national teams work from the same information.

  5. 05

    More defensible data

    Figures hold up to review by auditors, donors and oversight bodies.

  6. 06

    Operational continuity

    Work continues offline and through staff changes because the process lives in the system.

Build stronger agricultural systems.

Partner with AgriVault Data to design and deploy the infrastructure behind agricultural operations, reporting and decision-making.